LitFigure
← All articles
SCIENTIFIC FIGURE TOOLS / COMPARISON

Choose a scientific figure tool by the revision you need

Start with the change you will need after generation. A tool that drafts a clear mechanism and a tool that lets you move every label may solve different parts of the same figure.

LitFigure team · October 3, 2026

Disclosure: we build LitFigure. This comparison uses the linked public product descriptions checked on October 3, 2026. It is not a head-to-head generation benchmark, and the table order is not a quality ranking.

Compare the workflow, then open the file

Four scientific figure workflows and the checks to make before choosing
Tool / sourceStarting pointRevision workflowWhat to check
LitFigure ↗Describe a biomedical mechanism or workflow.Natural-language revisions and saved versions; canvas objects on supported structured documents.PNG directly; converted SVG can contain outlined labels. PPTX depends on the document type.
SciDraw AI ↗The public site describes text, sketch and reference-image workflows.The site describes conversational revision and SVG/PPTX editing.Inspect a sample export and confirm current plan limits; this guide has not tested its paid workflow.
BioRender ↗Scientific icons and templates, with AI figure features also offered.The current site advertises editable AI elements in beta alongside its figure workflow.Check the current subscription and publication license for your intended use.
FigPad ↗The public site describes prompts, sketches and reference images.The site describes vector conversion, an SVG editor and editable exports.Generation and vectorization are separate operations; inspect whether labels remain text.

BioRender now advertises AI features, so a simple “AI generator versus manual icons” comparison is incomplete. Ask what objects you can inspect and edit in the specific document, and what the current plan allows.

Three starting points, three different decisions

If you have a written mechanism, define the components, arrow meanings and required labels before generating. If you have a sketch, decide which placements must remain fixed. If you already have a figure, list the exact changes and keep the original for comparison.

For precise object placement, inspect the editor before committing to a workflow. A natural-language revision can also redraw details you did not ask to change. Compare the saved versions rather than assuming the request was applied perfectly.

An export extension does not settle editability

Try selecting one label in the exported file. Can you change its characters, or is it a group of paths? In a PPTX, is the figure made of native objects or one embedded image? A vector conversion can scale cleanly without preserving editable text or meaningful connectors.

LitFigure downloads PNG, converts SVG on demand and exports PPTX for supported editable documents. Its export guide explains the boundaries. For every tool, open an actual sample in the software you will use for the final revision.

Read LitFigure’s export guide →

Use one reviewable figure brief

Create a four-stage CAR-T preparation workflow: isolate PBMCs, activate T cells, transduce the CAR construct, then expand CAR-T cells. Number the stages and connect adjacent stages left to right. No patient infusion, treatment efficacy or invented experimental values.

Review the draft against that brief: four stages, correct order, readable labels and no added efficacy claim. Then request one small edit and inspect the whole result. This is a suggested evaluation procedure, not a test result reported here.

Before using the figure

  • Verify labels and scientific relationships against your sources.
  • Keep measured data and conceptual illustrations separate.
  • Inspect the final-size export, publication license and current journal policy.

A useful tool gives you a draft you can inspect and a practical route to the next revision. Choose by that route, not by a “publication-ready” claim alone.

Start a biomedical figure draft in LitFigure →